Investing

Investing in Ambiguity: A Portfolio Framework from AGI to Climate Hardware

/ lbhuston / Leave a comment

Modern deeptech investing often feels like groping in the dark. You’re not simply picking winners — you’re modeling futures, coping with extreme nonlinearity, and forcing structure on chaos. The research I’ve conducted in this area has been revealing. Below, I reflect on it, extend a few ideas, and flesh out how one might operationalize it in a venture or research‑lab context.

MacModeling

A. The Core Logic: Inputs → Levers → Outputs

At the heart of the structure is a clean mapping:

  • Inputs: budget, time horizon, risk tolerance, domain constraints, and a pipeline of opportunities.

  • Levers: probability calibration, tranche sizing (how much per bet), stage gating, diversification, optionality.

  • Outputs: expected value (EV), EV density (time‑adjusted), capital at risk, downside bounds, and the resulting portfolio mix.

That’s beautiful. It forces you to treat capital as fungible, time as a scarce and directional resource, and uncertainty as something you can steer—not ignore.

Two design observations:

  1. Time matters not just via discounting but via the density metric (EV per time), which encourages front‐loading or fast pivots.

  2. Risk budgeting isn’t just “don’t lose everything” — you allocate downside constraints (e.g. CaR95) and concentration caps. That enforces humility.

In practice, you’d want this wired into a rolling dashboard that updates “live” as bets progress or stall.

B. The Rubric: Scoring Ideas Before Modeling

Before you even build outcome models, you triage via a weighted rubric (0–5 scale). The weights:

Dimension Weight
Team quality 0.15
Problem size / TAM 0.10
Moat / defensibility 0.10
Path to revenue / de-risked endpoint 0.15
Evidence / traction / data / IP 0.15
Regulatory / operational complexity (inverted) 0.10
Time to liquidity / cash generation 0.10
Strategic fit / option value 0.15

You set a gate: proceed only if rubric ≥ 3.5/5.

The beauty: you make tacit heuristics explicit. You prevent chasing “cool but far-fetched” bets without grounding. Also, gating early keeps your modeling burden manageable.

One adjustment: you might allow “strategic fit / option value” to have nonlinear impact (e.g. a bet’s optionality is worth a multiplier above a linear score). That handles bets that act as platform gambles more than standalone projects.

C. Modeling Metrics & Formulas

Here’s how the framework turns score + domain judgment into outputs:

  1. EV (expected value) = ∑[p_i × PV(outcome_i)] − upfront_cost

  2. PV: discount cashflows by rate r. For one‑off outcomes, PV = cashflow × (1+r)^(−t). For annuities, use the standard annuity PV factor, then discount to start.

  3. EV per dollar = EV / upfront_cost

  4. EV density = (EV per dollar) / expected_time_to_liquidity

  5. Capital at Risk (CaR_α) = the loss threshold L such that P(loss ≤ L) ≥ α (e.g. α = 95%)

  6. Tranche sizing (fractional‑Kelly proxy):
    With payoff multiple b = (payoff / cost) − 1, and success prob p, failure prob q = 1 − p, the “ideal” fraction f* = (b p − q)/b. Use a conservative scale (25–50% of f*) to avoid overbetting.

  7. Diversification constraints: no more than 20–30% of portfolio EV in any one thesis; target ≥ 6 independent bets if possible.

You also run Monte Carlo simulations: randomly sample outcomes for each bet (across, say, 10,000 portfolio replications) to estimate return distributions, downside percentiles, and verify your CaR95 and concentration caps.

This gives a probabilistic sanity check: even if your point‐model EV is seductive, the tails often bite.

D. The Worked Case Studies

Here are three worked examples (AGI tools, biotech preclinical therapeutic, and climate hardware pilot) to illustrate how this plays out concretely. I’ll briefly recast them with commentary.

1. AGI Tools (Internal SaaS build)

  • Cost: $200,000

  • r = 12%

  • 3‑year annuity starting year 1

  • Outcomes: High / Medium / Low / Fail, with assigned probabilities

  • You compute PVs, then EV_gross = ~1,285,043; EV_net = ~1,085,043

  • EV per $ = ~5.425

  • EV density = ~10.85 / year

  • Using a fractional Kelly proxy you suggest allocating ~10% of risk budget.

Reflections: This is the kind of “shots on goal” gambit that high EV density encourages. If your pipeline supports multiple parallel AGI tooling bets, you can diversify idiosyncratic risk.

In real life, you’d want more conservative assumptions around traction, CAC payback, or re‑investment risk, but the skeleton is sound.

2. Biotech (Preclinical therapeutic)

  • Cost: $5,000,000

  • r = 15%

  • Long time horizon: first meaningful exit in year 3+

  • Outcomes: Phase 1 licensing, Phase 2 sale, full approval, or fail

  • EV_gross ≈ $10.594M → EV_net ≈ $5.594M

  • EV per $ ≈ 1.119

  • EV density ≈ 0.224 per year

Here, the low EV density, combined with a long duration and regulatory risk, justifies capping the allocation (e.g., ≤15%). This is consistent with how deep biotech bets behave in real funds: they offer huge upside, but long tails and binary risks dominate.

One nuance: because biotech outcomes are highly correlated (regulatory climates, volatility in drug approval regimes), you’d probably treat these bets as partially dependent. The diversification constraint must consider correlation, not just EV share.

3. Climate Tech Hardware Pilot

  • Cost: $1,500,000

  • r = 12%, expected liquidity ~3 years

  • Outcomes: major adoption, moderate, small licensing, or fail

  • EV_gross ≈ $2,614,765 → EV_net ≈ $1,114,765

  • EV per $ ≈ 0.743

  • EV density ≈ 0.248 per year

This is a middling bet: lower EV per cost, moderate duration, moderate outcome variance. It might function as a “hedge” or optionality play if you think climate tech valuations will re‑rate. But by itself, it likely wouldn’t dominate allocation unless you believe upside outcomes are undermodeled.

E. Sample Portfolio & Allocation Rationale

Consider the following:

You propose a hypothetical portfolio with $2M budget, moderate risk tolerance:

  • AGI tools: 6 parallel shots at $200k each = $1.2M

  • Climate pilot: a $800k first tranche with gate to follow-on

  • Biotech: monitored, no initial investment yet unless cofunding improves terms

Why this mix?

  • The AGI bets dominate in EV density and diversification; you spread across six distinct bets (thus reducing idiosyncratic risk).

  • The climate pilot offers an optional upside and complements your domain exposure (if you believe climate tech is underinvested).

  • The biotech bet is deferred until you can get more favorable terms or validation.

You respect concentration caps (no single thesis has > 20–30% EV share) while leaning toward bets with the highest time‐adjusted return.

F. Stage‑Gate Logic & Kill Criteria

Crucial to managing this model is a disciplined stage‑gate roadmap:

  • Gate 0 → 1: due diligence, basic feasibility check

  • Gate 1 → 2: early milestone (e.g. pilot, LOIs, KPIs)

  • Thereafter, gates tied to performance, pivot triggers, or partner interest

Kill criteria examples:

  • Miss two technical milestones in a row

  • CAC : LTV (or unit economics) fall below threshold

  • Regulatory slippage > 2 cycles without new positive evidence

  • Correlated downside shock across multiple bets triggers a pause

By forcing kill decisions rather than letting sunk cost inertia dominate, you preserve optionality to reallocate capital.

G. Reflections & Caveats

  1. Calibration is the weak link. The EV and tranche logic depend heavily on your probability estimates and payoff assumptions. Mistakes in those propagate. Periodic Bayesian updating and calibration should be baked in as a feedback loop.

  2. Correlation & regime risk. Deeptech bets are rarely independent — regulatory cycles, capital markets, macro shocks, or paradigm shifts can hit many bets simultaneously. Make sure your Monte Carlo simulation simulates correlation regime shocks, not just independent draws.

  3. Optionality is more than linear EV. Some bets serve as “platform enablers” (e.g. research spinouts) whose value multiplies in ways not captured in simple discounting. Make sure you allow for a structural “option value” that escapes linear EV.

  4. Time & capital liquidity friction. You may find you must pause follow-ons or reallocate capital midstream; your framework must be tolerant of “liquidity timing mismatch.”

  5. Behavioral failure modes. Decision fatigue, emotional attachment to ideas, or reluctance to kill projects can erode discipline. A formal governance process—perhaps an independent review committee—helps.

H. Suggested Enhancements & Next Steps

  • Dashboard & real‑time monitoring: build a tool (in Notion, Google Sheets + Python, or custom UI) that ingests actual metrics (KPIs, burn, usage) and compares them to model expectations.

  • Bayesian updating module: as you observe results, update posterior probabilities and EV estimates.

  • Scenario overlay for regime risk: e.g. a “recession / capital drought” stress model.

  • Meta‑portfolio of strategies: e.g. combining “fast bets” (high EV density) with “venture options” (lower density but optional upside).

  • Decision governance & kill review cycles: schedule quarterly “kill / pivot reviews” where chosen bets are reassessed relative to alternatives.

I. Conclusion

This framework is so much more than a spreadsheet—it’s a philosophically coherent approach to venture investing in environments of radical uncertainty. It treats bets as probabilistic options, forces structure around allocation and kill decisions, and lets time-adjusted return (density) fight for primacy over naive upside.

I’d say the real acid test is: run it live. Drop in your real pipeline, score the opportunities, simulate your portfolio, place small bets, and see what your tail risks and optionalities teach you over five quarters.

Support My Work

Support the creation of high-impact content and research. Sponsorship opportunities are available for specific topics, whitepapers, tools, or advisory insights. Learn more or contribute here: Buy Me A Coffee

 

* AI tools were used as a research assistant for this content, but human moderation and writing are also included. The included images are AI-generated.

The Mental Models of Crypto Compliance: A Hacker’s Perspective on Regulatory Risk

/ lbhuston / Leave a comment

Let’s discuss one of the most complex and misunderstood frontiers in tech right now: cryptocurrency regulation.

This isn’t just about keeping up with new laws. It’s about building an entire mental framework to understand risk in an ecosystem that thrives on decentralization but is now colliding head-on with centralized enforcement.

Thinking

I recently gave some thought to the current state of regulation in the industry and came up with something crucial that has been missing from mainstream discourse: how we think about compliance in crypto matters just as much as what we do about it.

Data Layers and the Devil in the Details

Here’s the first truth bomb: not all on-chain data is equal.

You’ve got raw data — think: transaction hashes, sender/receiver addresses, gas fees. Then there’s abstracted data — the kind analysts love, like market cap and trading volume.

Regulators treat these differently, and so should we. If you’re building tools or making investment decisions without distinguishing between raw and abstracted data, you’re flying blind.

What struck me was how clearly this breakdown mirrors infosec risk models. Think of raw data like packet captures. Useful, granular, noisy. Abstracted data is your dashboard — interpretive and prone to bias. You need both to build situational awareness, but you’d better know which is which.

Keep It Simple (But Not Simplistic)

In cybersecurity, we talk a lot about Occam’s Razor. The simplest explanation isn’t always right, but the most efficient solution that meets the requirements usually is.

Crypto compliance right now? It’s bloated. Teams are building Byzantine workflows with multiple overlapping audits, clunky spreadsheets, and policy documents that look like the tax code.

The smarter play is automation. Real-time compliance tooling. Alerting systems that spot anomalies before regulators do. Because let’s be honest — the cost of “too late” in crypto is often existential.

Reverse Engineering Risk: The Inversion Model

Here’s a mental model that should be part of every crypto project’s DNA: Inversion.

Instead of asking “What does good compliance look like?”, start with: “How do we fail?”

Legal penalties. Reputation hits. Token delistings. Work backward from these outcomes and you’ll find the root causes: weak KYC, vague policies, and unauditable code. This is classic hacker thinking — start from the failure state and reverse engineer defenses.

It’s not about paranoia. It’s about resilience.

Structured Due Diligence > FOMO

The paper references EY’s six-pillar framework for token risk analysis — technical, legal, cybersecurity, financial, governance, and reputational. That’s a solid model.

But the key insight is this: frameworks turn chaos into clarity.

It reminds me of the early days of PCI-DSS. Everyone hated it, but the structured checklist forced companies to at least look under the hood. In crypto, where hype still trumps hard questions, a due diligence framework is your best defense against FOMO-driven disaster.

Global Regulation: Same Storm, Different Boats

With MiCA rolling out in the EU and the US swinging between enforcement and innovation depending on who’s in office, we’re entering a phase of compliance relativity.

You can’t memorize the rules. They’ll change next quarter. What you can do is build adaptable frameworks that let you assess risk regardless of the jurisdiction.

That means dedicated compliance committees. Cross-functional teams. Automated KYC that actually works. And most importantly: ongoing, not one-time, risk assessment.

Final Thoughts: The Future Belongs to Systems Thinkers

Crypto isn’t the Wild West anymore. It’s more like the early days of the Internet — still full of potential, still fragile, and now squarely in regulators’ crosshairs.

The organizations that survive won’t be the ones with the flashiest NFTs or the most Discord hype. They’ll be the ones who take compliance seriously — not as a bureaucratic burden, but as a strategic advantage.

Mental models like inversion, Occam’s Razor, and structured due diligence aren’t just academic. They’re how we turn regulatory chaos into operational clarity.

And if you’re still thinking of compliance as a checklist, rather than a mindset?

You’re already behind…

 

 

* AI tools were used as a research assistant for this content, but human moderation and writing are also included. The included images are AI-generated.

Market Intelligence for the Rest of Us: Building a $2K AI for Startup Signals

/ lbhuston / Leave a comment

It’s a story we hear far too often in tech circles: powerful tools locked behind enterprise price tags. If you’re a solo founder, indie investor, or the kind of person who builds MVPs from a kitchen table, the idea of paying $2,000 a month for market intelligence software sounds like a punchline — not a product. But the tide is shifting. Edge AI is putting institutional-grade analytics within reach of anyone with a soldering iron and some Python chops.

Pi400WithAI

Edge AI: A Quiet Revolution

There’s a fascinating convergence happening right now: the Raspberry Pi 400, an all-in-one keyboard-computer for under $100, is powerful enough to run quantized language models like TinyLLaMA. These aren’t toys. They’re functional tools that can parse financial filings, assess sentiment, and deliver real-time insights from structured and unstructured data.

The performance isn’t mythical either. When you quantize a lightweight LLM to 4-bit precision, you retain 95% of the accuracy while dropping memory usage by up to 70%. That’s a trade-off worth celebrating, especially when you’re paying 5–15 watts to keep the whole thing running. No cloud fees. No vendor lock-in. Just raw, local computation.

The Indie Investor’s Dream Stack

The stack described in this setup is tight, scrappy, and surprisingly effective:

  • Raspberry Pi 400: Your edge AI hardware base.

  • TinyLLaMA: A lean, mean 1.1B-parameter model ready for signal extraction.

  • VADER: Old faithful for quick sentiment reads.

  • SEC API + Web Scraping: Data collection that doesn’t rely on SaaS vendors.

  • SQLite or CSV: Because sometimes, the simplest storage works best.

If you’ve ever built anything in a bootstrapped environment, this architecture feels like home. Minimal dependencies. Transparent workflows. And full control of your data.

Real-World Application, Real-Time Signals

From scraping startup news headlines to parsing 10-Ks and 8-Ks from EDGAR, the system functions as a low-latency, always-on market radar. You’re not waiting for quarterly analyst reports or delayed press releases. You’re reading between the lines in real time.

Sentiment scores get calculated. Signals get aggregated. If the filings suggest a risk event while the news sentiment dips negative? You get a notification. Email, Telegram bot, whatever suits your alert style.

The dashboard component rounds it out — historical trends, portfolio-specific signals, and current market sentiment all wrapped in a local web UI. And yes, it works offline too. That’s the beauty of edge.

Why This Matters

It’s not just about saving money — though saving over $46,000 across three years compared to traditional tools is no small feat. It’s about reclaiming autonomy in an industry that’s increasingly centralized and opaque.

The truth is, indie analysts and small investment shops bring valuable diversity to capital markets. They see signals the big firms overlook. But they’ve lacked the tooling. This shifts that balance.

Best Practices From the Trenches

The research set outlines some key lessons worth reiterating:

  • Quantization is your friend: 4-bit LLMs are the sweet spot.

  • Redundancy matters: Pull from multiple sources to validate signals.

  • Modular design scales: You may start with one Pi, but load balancing across a cluster is just a YAML file away.

  • Encrypt and secure: Edge doesn’t mean exempt from risk. Secure your API keys and harden your stack.

What Comes Next

There’s a roadmap here that could rival a mid-tier SaaS platform. Social media integration. Patent data. Even mobile dashboards. But the most compelling idea is community. Open-source signal strategies. GitHub repos. Tutorials. That’s the long game.

If we can democratize access to investment intelligence, we shift who gets to play — and who gets to win.

Final Thoughts

I love this project not just for the clever engineering, but for the philosophy behind it. We’ve spent decades building complex, expensive systems that exclude the very people who might use them in the most novel ways. This flips the script.

If you’re a founder watching the winds shift, or an indie VC tired of playing catch-up, this is your chance. Build the tools. Decode the signals. And most importantly, keep your stack weird.

How To:

Build Instructions: DIY Market Intelligence

This system runs best when you treat it like a home lab experiment with a financial twist. Here’s how to get it up and running.

🧰 Hardware Requirements

  • Raspberry Pi 400 ($90)

  • 128GB MicroSD card ($25)

  • Heatsink/fan combo (optional, $10)

  • Reliable internet connection

🔧 Phase 1: System Setup

  1. Install Raspberry Pi OS Desktop

  2. Update and install dependencies

    sudo apt update -y && sudo apt upgrade -y
sudo apt install python3-pip -y
pip3 install pandas nltk transformers torch
python3 -c "import nltk; nltk.download('all')"

🌐 Phase 2: Data Collection

  1. News Scraping

    • Use requests + BeautifulSoup to parse RSS feeds from financial news outlets.

    • Filter by keywords, deduplicate articles, and store structured summaries in SQLite.

  2. SEC Filings

    • Install sec-api:

      pip3 install sec-api

    • Query recent 10-K/8-Ks and store the content locally.

    • Extract XBRL data using Python’s lxml or bs4.

🧠 Phase 3: Sentiment and Signal Detection

  1. Basic Sentiment: VADER

    from nltk.sentiment.vader import SentimentIntensityAnalyzer
analyzer = SentimentIntensityAnalyzer()
scores = analyzer.polarity_scores(text)

  2. Advanced LLMs: TinyLLaMA via Ollama

    • Install Ollama: ollama.com

    • Pull and run TinyLLaMA locally:

      ollama pull tinyllama
ollama run tinyllama

    • Feed parsed content and use the model for classification, signal extraction, and trend detection.

📊 Phase 4: Output & Monitoring

  1. Dashboard

    • Use Flask or Streamlit for a lightweight local dashboard.

    • Show:

      • Company-specific alerts

      • Aggregate sentiment trends

      • Regulatory risk events

  2. Alerts

    • Integrate with Telegram or email using standard Python libraries (smtplib, python-telegram-bot).

    • Send alerts when sentiment dips sharply or key filings appear.

Use Cases That Matter

🕵️ Indie VC Deal Sourcing

  • Monitor startup mentions in niche publications.

  • Score sentiment around funding announcements.

  • Identify unusual filing patterns ahead of new rounds.

🚀 Bootstrapped Startup Intelligence

  • Track competitors’ regulatory filings.

  • Stay ahead of shifting sentiment in your vertical.

  • React faster to macroeconomic events impacting your market.

⚖️ Risk Management

  • Flag negative filing language or missing disclosures.

  • Detect regulatory compliance risks.

  • Get early warning on industry disruptions.

Lessons From the Edge

If you’re already spending $20/month on ChatGPT and juggling half a dozen spreadsheets, consider this your signal. For under $2K over three years, you can build a tool that not only pays for itself, but puts you on competitive footing with firms burning $50K on dashboards and dashboards about dashboards.

There’s poetry in this setup: lean, fast, and local. Like the best tools, it’s not just about what it does — it’s about what it enables. Autonomy. Agility. Insight.

And perhaps most importantly, it’s yours.

Support My Work and Content Like This

Support the creation of high-impact content and research. Sponsorship opportunities are available for specific topics, whitepapers, tools, or advisory insights. Learn more or contribute here: Buy Me A Coffee

 

 

 

* AI tools were used as a research assistant for this content, but human moderation and writing are also included. The included images are AI-generated.

 

🧭 Beyond Crystal Balls: Making Better Financial Bets with Bayesian Brains

/ lbhuston / Leave a comment

 

If you’ve ever wondered whether your financial model might be more fiction than forecast, you’re not alone. 🌀 We’ve all built (or trusted) a model that felt solid—until the market laughed in its face. Turns out, model uncertainty is one of the biggest blind spots in finance.

Luckily, Bayesian methods don’t just shine a flashlight into the dark—they help map the cave while you’re in it. Let’s talk about why that matters.

Infograph060925 2

🎲 What Is Model Uncertainty, Really?

Imagine you’re planning a road trip, but you’re not sure if your GPS is even set to the right state. That’s model uncertainty. It’s not just about the data, it’s about whether the entire framework you’re using is the right one.

In finance, this shows up when:

* Your model assumes a normal distribution, but reality goes fat-tailed 📉
*You pick the “wrong” factors in your investment model
*Policy or market dynamics shift so fast your model gets stale
Bayesian approaches handle this by saying: “Why pick one model when you can blend several?” Using Bayesian model averaging, you don’t bet on a single winner—you weigh your bets across multiple contenders, each with their own probability.

🧠 Beating Bias: Bayesian Learning to the Rescue

One of the sneaky traps investors fall into is recency bias—the tendency to overweigh recent events. (Just ask anyone who panic-sold at the wrong time. 🙋‍♂️)

Bayesian learning gently reins that in. It updates your beliefs steadily, incorporating new data without tossing out everything that came before.

It’s like the opposite of headline-chasing—it’s strategy based on the full picture.

🚫 Don’t Let Confidence Become a Trap

Bayesian models also help us avoid a dangerous pitfall: false confidence. Just because a model spits out precise numbers doesn’t mean those numbers are right. Rigid models often fail to account for rare events or black swans.

Bayesian thinking bakes uncertainty right into the math. Instead of saying, “X will happen,” it says, “Here’s the range of what might happen, and how likely each scenario is.” That humility makes for much smarter risk management.

✨ The Takeaway

Bayesian tools aren’t magic. They won’t hand you a crystal ball or guarantee 20% returns. But they will help you:

🔄 Stay adaptive
📊 Balance competing risks
🧩 Account for what you don’t know
⚖️ Make better decisions over time

In a world where models can deceive and data changes daily, Bayesian thinking is less about finding the perfect answer—and more about asking the right questions.

Stay curious. Question your tools. And never stop updating your beliefs.

 

Support the creation of high-impact content and research. Sponsorship opportunities are available for specific topics, whitepapers, tools, or advisory insights. Learn more or contribute here: Buy Me A Coffee

* AI tools were used as a research assistant for this content, but human moderation and writing are also included. The included images are AI-generated.

🔍 Taming the Chaos: Bayesian Methods in Real-World Market Mayhem

/ lbhuston / Leave a comment

Let’s face it: markets can be absolute chaos. One day, crypto is mooning 🚀. The next? Your portfolio looks like it fell down an elevator shaft. Whether it’s tech stocks, foreign currencies, or those mysterious private equity plays—uncertainty is the name of the game.

So how do we make sense of the madness? That’s where Bayesian methods shine. Let’s explore how this approach handles messy, real-world investment scenarios in ways that feel more like strategy and less like guesswork.

Infograph060925 1

📉 Tech Stocks: The Volatility Playground

Tech stocks are the drama queens of the financial world—flashy, emotional, and occasionally brilliant. Predicting their behavior is like trying to forecast what your cat will do next. (Spoiler: chaos. 🐱)

With Bayesian methods, we don’t just cross our fingers and hope. We take what we know (past earnings, macroeconomic data, investor sentiment), and update that with each quarterly report, policy shift, or product launch.

Think of it like a smart thermostat—always learning, adjusting, and optimizing based on the latest readings.

🪙 Cryptocurrency: Where Rules Go to Die

If tech stocks are drama queens, crypto is the rebellious teenager who ignores curfews and reinvents money while doing it. 📉📈📉📈

Bayesian techniques help us build probabilistic models that can adapt to the wild swings. Instead of betting everything on one model (like “Bitcoin always rebounds”), we average across several plausible views—some bullish, some bearish—based on real-time data.

It’s like having a squad of advisors whispering in your ear instead of just the loudest one at the table.

💱 Foreign Currency: Subtle But Deadly

Foreign currency markets don’t always get the headlines, but wow—can they sneak up on you. From trade wars to interest rate moves, they’re constantly shifting. And if you’re holding investments abroad? You’re automatically playing in this game.

Here, Bayesian methods work wonders by adjusting for spillovers—like how a U.S. Fed move might impact the Euro or Aussie dollar. Bayesian models can detect these effects and shift forecasts accordingly.

They’re like sensitive seismographs for financial tremors you didn’t even know were coming.

🧠 Decision-Making, Upgraded

Traditional models often get stuck in their assumptions—like an old GPS insisting you drive through a lake. Bayesian models say, “Whoa, new data just came in—let’s re-route.”

They help us:

✔Stay flexible in fast-changing conditions
✔Avoid overreacting to noise
✔Balance competing risks intelligently

And yeah, they take a little effort to understand. But trust me—once you see the results, it’s hard to go back.

Next up: In our final post of this series, we’ll dig into how Bayesian methods help tackle one of the biggest hidden risks in finance—model uncertainty. It’s like questioning whether your map is even the right one.

Until then—keep learning, stay skeptical, and treat your beliefs like software: always in beta. 🧠💻

 

* AI tools were used as a research assistant for this content, but human moderation and writing are also included. The included images are AI-generated.

🧠 Betting on Beliefs: Why Bayesian Thinking Belongs in Your Investment Toolbox

/ lbhuston / Leave a comment

If you’ve ever made an investment decision that felt like a coin toss, welcome to the club. 📉📈 Uncertainty is baked into finance, no matter how many spreadsheets or models we throw at it. But here’s the good news: there’s a smarter way to deal with this unpredictability. It’s called Bayesian thinking—and it’s kind of like upgrading your brain with a statistics-powered GPS for navigating risky terrain.

ThinkingNotes

Let’s unpack this, not as a PhD thesis, but like we’re two old friends talking about the markets over coffee (and maybe some bourbon 🍸 if it’s been that kind of quarter).

What’s Bayesian Thinking Anyway?

Named after Thomas Bayes—a statistician and theologian with a knack for probability—Bayesian thinking is all about updating your beliefs as new data comes in. Imagine you’re sailing a boat in foggy weather. You can’t see much, but every ping from your radar helps you refine your course. That’s Bayesian logic at work: start with a guess (your prior), then update that guess as more info rolls in (your posterior).

In the world of investing, this isn’t just helpful—it’s survival gear.

Why This Matters More Than Ever

Markets today feel like riding a rollercoaster with no seatbelt. From crypto crashes to interest rate whiplash, traditional models often fail to keep up. Bayesian methods thrive in these situations because they:

✅ Incorporate uncertainty (instead of pretending it’s not there)
✅ Constantly learn and adapt as conditions change
✅ Handle model errors and parameter guesswork with more nuance than rigid formulas

In other words, Bayesian tools are like having a financial weatherman who admits they don’t know everything—but gets more accurate every time it rains.

Real Talk: Why I Use This Stuff

Here’s a dirty little secret: no model gets it right all the time. But Bayesian approaches admit that up front. They say, “Hey, let’s not commit to one truth. Let’s explore a bunch of possibilities and adjust as we go.” That humility is powerful. Especially in markets where the only constant is change.

Plus, it fits with how humans actually think. We revise our opinions as we learn—why shouldn’t our investment models do the same?

Final Thought: Don’t Be a Dinosaur 🦕 in a Digital Jungle

If you’re still using old-school statistical tools that ignore uncertainty or can’t adapt on the fly, you’re setting yourself up to get blindsided. Bayesian methods aren’t just for math geeks—they’re for anyone serious about managing risk in the real world.

So next time you’re staring at your portfolio, wondering what the heck just happened, ask yourself this: “What do I believe now, and how should I change my mind based on what I just learned?”

That’s the Bayesian mindset.

Stay adaptive. Stay curious. Stay a little skeptical. And as always—question everything.

Coming up next: we’ll dive into how this plays out with real market chaos—from crypto crashes to the currency jungle. 🪙💱📊

 

* AI tools were used as a research assistant for this content, but human moderation and writing are also included. The included images are AI-generated.

 

New Whitepaper: Deeper Dive on Digital Asset Investing

/ lbhuston / Leave a comment

Several folks have asked me to dive deeper into the digital asset investing post and discuss my thoughts on holding digital assets. 

DigitalAssets

That said, I spent some time working with my AI tools and researching deeper into the thoughts I shared earlier. 

The outcome is a much longer whitepaper, which you can download here if you are interested.

If you enjoy it, or want to discuss, please feel free to email me and let me know your thoughts (bhuston@microsolved.com). 

You can download the whitepaper here: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/hkzywtukx2buhb05b92v4/Navigating-the-Digital-Asset-Investment-Landscape_.pdf?rlkey=5z0pag4hr4e3sk0ohck6j0yn0&dl=0

 

Disclaimer:
This content is provided for informational and research purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. I am not a licensed financial advisor, and nothing in this document should be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any financial instrument or pursue any specific strategy. Always consult a qualified financial professional before making any financial decisions.

Navigating the Noise: A Personal Take on Digital Asset Investing

/ lbhuston / Leave a comment

The last few years have seen digital assets storm from the periphery of tech geek circles to the forefront of institutional portfolios. We’ve moved from whispering about Bitcoin at hacker conferences to hearing it discussed on earnings calls by publicly traded companies. And while the hype machines are louder than ever, so is the regulatory drumbeat. The digital asset world has matured—but it hasn’t gotten simpler.

DigitalAssets

Here’s my personal attempt to cut through the noise, and talk about what really matters.

From Curiosity to Core Holdings

It used to be that crypto was a side hustle for technophiles and libertarians. Today, with over 617 million crypto holders globally and institutions dedicating 10% or more of their portfolios to digital assets, this thing is mainstream. Even BlackRock, the same folks behind the traditional investment portfolios of yesteryear, have rolled out a Bitcoin ETF that’s become the fastest-growing in history.

That tells us something: digital assets are no longer the fringe. They’re foundational.

The Seven Faces of Digital Assets

This market is anything but monolithic. From my perspective, it’s better understood as an ecosystem with seven distinct species: Network tokens, Security tokens, Company-backed tokens, Arcade tokens, Collectible tokens (NFTs), Asset-backed tokens, and Memecoins. Each category carries different risk profiles and regulatory considerations. Understanding them is critical—especially if you’re trying to build a resilient, well-diversified portfolio.

Risk Isn’t a Bug—It’s a Feature

One of the biggest lies I see in mainstream discourse is the framing of crypto risk as something to be eliminated. But risk isn’t just part of the deal—it’s the entire point. Risk is the price of opportunity.

That said, you need a framework. I like the four-step approach: identify, analyze, assess, and plan treatments. It’s not rocket science, but you’d be surprised how many people skip step one.

Regulation: The Double-Edged Sword

For years, regulation was the bogeyman. Now, it’s becoming the moat. The EU’s MiCA framework is setting the global standard with its methodical categorization of tokens and service providers. Meanwhile, the U.S. is going through its own regulatory renaissance. Under the Trump administration, we’ve seen a pro-crypto tilt—rescinding anti-custody policies, establishing a Crypto Task Force, and explicitly banning CBDCs.

The Future Is Multi-Token, Multi-Strategy

Digital assets aren’t one-size-fits-all. Institutional investors are moving beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum into DeFi tokens, gaming assets, and stablecoins. That’s not diversification for its own sake—it’s strategy.

Final Thoughts

This isn’t a post about getting rich. It’s about getting ready. Digital assets are here to stay. They’re volatile, yes. They’re complex, absolutely. But they also represent one of the most transformative shifts in the financial landscape since the creation of the internet.

References

 

Disclaimer:
This content is provided for informational and research purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. I am not a licensed financial advisor, and nothing in this document should be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any financial instrument or pursue any specific strategy. Always consult a qualified financial professional before making any financial decisions.